Council OKs Sanitation Contract, Union Deal

The contract with Casworth Enterprises will save Moorestown roughly $500,000 in the first year.

Moorestown Township Council. Credit: Patch file photo
Moorestown Township Council. Credit: Patch file photo

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story contained an error. The actual savings from outsourcing sanitation will be approximately $500,000 per year during the life of the contract, according to Tom Merchel, the township's chief financial officer.

Merchel explained that, while the difference between the Casworth contract and the township's sanitation budget is roughly $800,000, that's not all savings. The township is still retaining the sanitation employees and using them in other divisions of Public Works, and creating four new positions to make room for them. So while all 11 sanitation positions are being wiped off the expense side of the ledger, the addition of four new positions equals a net total of seven positions cut.


After weathering criticism and questions from a mostly oppositional crowd, Moorestown council members OK’d a contract Monday night to outsource trash collection, along with a union deal that will preserve jobs.

The three-year contract with Woodbury-based Casworth Enterprises will cost the township roughly $1.3 million over the life of the contract, according to township manager Scott Carew. By contrast, sanitation services cost the town approximately $1.2 million in 2013 alone. With the decision, Moorestown joins the vast majority of Burlington County municipalities that use private trash haulers.

Township officials stressed that the level of service will be relatively unchanged: bulk collection remains, as does the recycling center. The only noticeable impact may be a change in the collection schedule, though those details are still undecided, Mayor Chris Chiacchio said.

Council Greg Newcomer said maintaining quality of service was one of his chief concerns.

“I investigated every town I could find that used (Casworth) and I could not find quality of service issues,” he said, adding, “We believe we are doing a value-added thing, actually taking one service and making it a better service.”

In tandem with the contract, council also approved a memorandum of agreement with the Communications Workers of America 1036 (CWA)—which represents Public Works, as well as the township’s water and sewer employees and clerical staff—that avoids layoffs by allowing sanitation workers to fill open positions in other divisions of Public Works.

Township manager Scott Carew called the arrangement “the best of both worlds” and credited the CWA and its representatives for their diligence in coming to an agreement.

CWA president Adam Liebtag was less enthusiastic about the deal: “It’s a job security agreement, negotiated under very difficult circumstances.”

I won’t stand here and say that we support the privatization of sanitation, because we don’t,” he said. “That said, we do agree and we do support—I support—the memorandum of agreement, which is going to essentially provide additional services by reallocating resources from the sanitation division to Public Works … It’s the right thing to do given the circumstances.”

Both Liebtag and township officials noted the depletion of Public Works over the last few years and said the addition of the sanitation workers—who will retain the same salary, benefits and seniority, and perform similar jobs—to other roles within the department will enhance the level of service.

The agreement also contains concessions from the union, including smaller wage increases for the affected workers, that will save the township between $175,000-200,000 per year for the next three.

Despite council’s approval, the agreement with the union is still only tentative until the full union membership—which includes the eight sanitation employees, along with all the other members—approves it, Liebtag said. A vote will take place this week.  

When asked by township solicitor Anthony Drollas whether he expected an affirmative vote, Liebtag said, “I hope that it will be approved and we’re going to do everything we can to recommend ratification.”

Some residents questioned the township’s math, wondering how it could save roughly $500,000 without laying off any employees. Carew broke down the numbers, explaining that—in addition to the savings from concessions—the township would also save $50,000 in operational expenses and hundreds of thousands by eliminating the sanitation positions (not the employees). 

Though a handful of residents continued to challenge the numbers, Carew stressed, “No one’s playing any games. No one’s trying to pull the wool over your eyes. If that was the case, Mr. Liebtag would have had a lot different tenor when he spoke.”

Others worried the township would find itself in a difficult position when it comes time to renew its contract, suggesting Casworth would jack up its rates.

“I know this is what happens, because for 15 years I represented trash haulers, and that’s what we did,” said Jonathan Eron.

Carew, however, dismissed the notion and stressed the township had done its due diligence in picking a vendor and crafting the contract: “The idea that when this contract is over we’re going to be taken to the cleaners is unfounded.”
Patricia White January 29, 2014 at 09:09 PM
sanlazarro: Oh my gosh, the lightbulb just went off. I think that particular watering hole had a lot of elephant patronage during the liquor law situation. Good place to skirt the musty confines of the Sunshine Law.
Taxpayer101 January 29, 2014 at 09:13 PM
I thought I read earlier that the Sanitation Supervisor was ill. I'm sure he'll be on the mend and back at work in his new position as soon as possible. Why would anyone remove a comment wishing someone well. As I stated before juvenile, ignorant and the sign of a guilty conscience. Get Well Soon!
Taxpayer101 January 29, 2014 at 09:38 PM
Ms. White, you are not the only one that just got that post. It's the information age too-cells, mini cells, wrist cells. Not much goes unrecorded these days. Prime targets are the politically charged environments. I lost count of the cells recording during the last council meeting. Good thing for the sanitation supervisor. It's on the record everywhere that he has a job open for him. Privacy is important, but open government is just as important.
sanlazarro12173 January 30, 2014 at 02:25 AM
Yes they did taxpayer. It was mine. Hope no one rushes his recovery or interferes with his medical treatments. The township said all sanitation employees would be provided a job. All. Hate to see anyone rush to get back to work for fear of losing their job at the cost of their health.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »