.
News Alert
UPDATE: Massive Berkeley Brush Fire Contained As…

Council Still Facing Tax Hike in Latest Budget

To avoid a tax increase, Moorestown council members will need to close a $1 million gap—a near-impossible task, according to the township manager.

As it stands now, the township needs to close a $1 million gap to avoid a tax increase in this year’s budget.

Talking over the latest draft of the budget Thursday morning, the consensus among members of township council was none of them were terribly happy with the budget.

In its current form, the $22.9 million budget increases the tax levy by $1,011,900 from last year, a 2.6 cent (or 7.83 percent) increase from 2011’s tax rate. Based on that increase, a taxpayer with a home assessed at the township average of $529,800 would pay $1,896.68 in municipal taxes, a $137.74 increase from last year.

Because the township's budget didn't hit the state-imposed 2 percent cap last year, it was allowed (by law) to "bank" the difference and use it to offset the levy increase this year. The township's 2012 budget currently uses $725,277 of the $926,452 levy cap bank from last year's budget. 

Trying to close the gap

Councilmen Greg Gallo and Mike Testa both said, if votes were taken today, they’d be a “no” on the budget, and none of the other council members seemed excited about it either.

But township manager Scott Carew was blunt about the realities of the budget.

“I literally don’t think we can close the gap in spending,” he told council. “If we’re looking at getting to no increase, that means we’re a million dollars away from that.”

One of the major drivers behind the size of the increase, Carew explained, was a significant dip in the township's available surplus. In 2008, the township used $4.7 million in surplus to close the budget gap and last year used $2.4 million. The 2012 budget only calls for $1.2 million from surplus, due to its depletion in previous budgets, he said.

On the bright side, Carew said, looking ahead to next year, “I believe the surplus will not be a million-dollar problem like it is this year,” partly due to an increase in commercial ratables (i.e. ) and .

Speaking of liquor licenses, township financial officer Tom Merchel had plugged $500,000 from the (projected) sale of one license into , which called for a 1.8 cent increase to the current tax rate. But that’s been taken out, Carew explained, because the township can’t budget that money until it actually has the check in the bank.

Also, the township’s state aid will stay flat from last year, at $1.8 million.

Carew said he was “comfortable this is a very responsible budget to continue to provide the level of service we’re providing.”

However, Testa said the township has “a spending problem.”

“As a taxpayer, I’m frustrated I’m paying more taxes for the same amount of service,” he said.

But Carew defended the budget, explaining the township has been faced with revenue sources that have either decreased or stayed flat (i.e. state aid, surplus) and expenses (i.e. health insurance) that have increased.

Though Carew was dubious about the township’s chances to shave $1 million from the budget to keep taxes flat, council members were not ready to surrender yet and will schedule another budget meeting at their regular meeting Monday.

Moorestown Leadership Problem March 08, 2012 at 09:20 PM
Fire Scott Carew. Fellows - this is simple. Tell this guy YOU WILL NOT RAISE TAXES. Any dope knows raising taxes in an election year is a poison pill. Finally Mr. Testa has something right - Moorestown has a spending problem - Its Mayor John Button. If our Republican ticket in 2012 is to be successful, John simply has to retire and not run. You want a sustainable Moorestown, lower the taxes.
Chris Moye March 09, 2012 at 03:40 AM
I agree. No raising taxes. We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
Candidate showdown March 09, 2012 at 04:19 AM
What options do we have to not have a tax increase ?
Franklin Dinaglio March 09, 2012 at 02:01 PM
Chris-I guess we'll have to start calling you Grover! What spending would you drive out in order to avoid a tax increase. I've repeatedly suggested the town scrap plans for a new town hall. What do the rest of you suggest?
Mtown Talker March 09, 2012 at 02:29 PM
Ok frankie, I think we could still build a new town hall and police at the same locale. It can move quicker as someone said earlier if it's a prefab.. It would only take a few weeks to be built in a factory rather than build everything on site. And some don't like the idea of rehab but at this point in the game rehab the existing library and find a good design and use for the second floor. That's probably the best option moving forward. Perhaps the "shared" courts can be on site rather than in the industrial zone. We can still get the petty cash from other townships that use it.
In the Cheap Seats March 09, 2012 at 03:21 PM
Will the MRMC chair write a letter to the editor telling us what options the MRMC wants implemented after our meeting?
Mtown Talker March 09, 2012 at 04:17 PM
Hi cheap, I believe you are on the wrong blog? What would the mrmc chair has to implement after a town council meeting? What influence does he have at council meetings?
fyathyrio March 09, 2012 at 05:23 PM
Good Question
Moorestown Leadership Problem March 09, 2012 at 07:32 PM
Fellows - How does this sound, Vote for me, I will raise your taxes! Can this be a winning formula for the party this Fall? No new taxes boys!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something